3v3 Suggestion Box

[gRRRR]

Post here if u want to suggest :P

i got one that mite stop ppl askin for 3v3 all the time. Mayb its gay but i like to tell u about it.

It would be like some1 typws "!request 3v3 or 5v5" and this comes on:

<[iPGN-Bot]> Game 3v3 Begun by Request. @ 7:25pm. Type !me to join (Please make sure your name is the same as the one on CS-Comp Stats)
* ChanServ changes topic to '.:•:. iPGN CS 3v3! http://iPGN.com.au/cs-comp .:•:. News: A 3v3 Game is now open, type !me to join .:•:.'

and ppl join in the game wif !me and once filled, admins online can type
!take and they would run the 3v3 :D But if game isnt taken wifin 1min a notice would b sounded and in 10sec no reply game is cancled.

I hope its a ok stuggestion. Mayb it is a wastse but i fink its ok :)

[Pip-Boy]

its a semi ok suggestion, except that generally if an admin can/wants to run a game, they just go and run one :)

[Jin]

Shazza I Lub j00!!!~~~~~

The idea is not bad, we'll give some thoughts to it.

[V]

thats a very nice idea...

[Idol]

make sum rule or clarify the rules on laggers/afks mid game

been in quite a few games where 6 or 7 rounds in sum1 goes afk/lags out and every1 plays on.....obviously the team which has 2 ppl loses the remaining rounds

i reckon there should be a restart if the person comes back or if a replacement is found......a reshuffle and restart

i know ppl say "cbf" etc.........but wats the point of having rules if it only sometimes its used

[Cougar]

Thing with that, is then over a quarter of the game has to be replayed, and what if it happens a second time. You could end up playing 2 games instead of one.

I personally think players should be frozen on the spot, and sit it out untill a replacement or whatever is brought in. If 2 rounds go by waiting, note which team won those 2 rounds, and exclude them, play untill 12 proper rounds have been played.

[Catch-22]

If 2 rounds go by waiting, note which team won those 2 rounds, and exclude them, play untill 12 proper rounds have been played.

the problem is that the team that won those two rounds will have extra $$$

[gRRRR]

woot my idea its a "Semi good one" :D
SWEET!

Ok i hav more to add to make it a better idea.
As pip said if admin are there and yes they are they would run a game which is fair enuf but sometimes they may b there but not start one.

Mayb if it is possible to do it lik pug?
i know thats bad as in the person who "!request" for the game becomes temp admin. This sounds like a risk. Actually its gay dw hahah :S

Ok again. Now Admins dont always start games when they are around (Personal Reason) and mayb this can help get admins who are afk come and just admin and not hav to play. Cause its not that hard to admin a game outside the game. Ok if ur gonna okay and admin sures go ahead and use normal command. But if every1 afk and one person wants to play and he "!request 3v3" and the games starts up and ppl join and there is 6
admins dont hav to take it. To b honest i rekon its really just a way of gettin more games running (Cause i want to play more) :P
i fink i wrote to much now :S

[gRRRR]

Shazza I Lub j00!!!~~~~~

The idea is not bad, we'll give some thoughts to it.

Neg! Tom i lub Shazza :P

haha thnx tom for readin it :)

[DarK]

Having games that are run by the public will never happen, it was part of the conditions of getting the 3v3 in the first place, an authorised person had to be present while a game was being played...

Although I do like your idea, i've suggested to the others a way we might be able to do it.
we will keep in touch

[Mr.T]

we will keep in touch

dont call us we wont call you?

[gRRRR]

Although I do like your idea, i've suggested to the others a way we might be able to do it.
we will keep in touch

Thnx dark. I hope u guys can figure out somefin really good from my idea and 3v3 can progress futher into popularity :)

[Fezwah]

well another way is too allow the game to be run regs

or someh and picked helpers as such eventho u have helpers.

A little like the game op situation on GA, basically giving them the right to run a game, lo3 command, and say command

and thats about it

just an idea :D

[Catch-22]

well another way is too allow the game to be run regs

or someh and picked helpers as such eventho u have helpers.

A little like the game op situation on GA, basically giving them the right to run a game, lo3 command, and say command

and thats about it

just an idea :D

but what happens if something goes pear-shaped? A real and trusted admin needs to be there who knows how to handle such situations, can remove people from the game if necessary, etc. We can't spend all our (and when I say 'our' I really mean Raven's ;)) time looking at the logs to work out what happened in a game with a temp rcon'er.

[Cougar]

the problem is that the team that won those two rounds will have extra $$$

Wouldnt this be better, rather than having one of the teams play a man down for rounds that count ? O_o

[gRRRR]

Another suggestion. Regarding Seeded games

What if some1 from f`zero comes and plays 3v3 comp for 1st time
and we dunno hes a fzero dude and he gets seeded 5th or 6th as hes ratio is 0 to the bot. He of course will end up on a team thats is clearly over skilled and its would be a landslide game. Is there anything u can do to prefevent this??? anything??

[Pip-Boy]

when a new person plays a game they are given a random seeding - it is the best we can do.

[Public.EnEmY]

f zero, leet clans usually cant play so leet when there on there own, and why worry, seeded does get close games 80% of the time :)

[DarK]

Another suggestion. Regarding Seeded games

What if some1 from f`zero comes and plays 3v3 comp for 1st time
and we dunno hes a fzero dude and he gets seeded 5th or 6th as hes ratio is 0 to the bot. He of course will end up on a team thats is clearly over skilled and its would be a landslide game. Is there anything u can do to prefevent this??? anything??
Basically as pip said, it's random
But in the end it's all for fun and this shouldn't really worry you ;)


I think with the !request stuff we have just abourt decided that it isn't needed. If an admin can run a game, he will, he will start it and see if there's 6 on. We talked about it and we can't really see it being that much advantage

[gRRRR]

Basically as pip said, it's random
But in the end it's all for fun and this shouldn't really worry you ;)


I think with the !request stuff we have just abourt decided that it isn't needed. If an admin can run a game, he will, he will start it and see if there's 6 on. We talked about it and we can't really see it being that much advantage


hehe thnx dark
i'm happi that u guys even talked about it :)

atleast i did some good ratter then always spam for a 3v3 :D

[saZ`]

I have a very sexy suggestion which will allow everyone to watch my leet skills....

how about get a HLTV proxy for the ipgn 3v3 comp server? heres the problems i see with the suggestion and solutions:

Problems:
1. its been suggested people will steam friends cheat with it... well HLTV = delayed by 30 or more seconds depending.
2. where would the box for the proxy be hosted.. maybe email shad ask if it could be hosted on one of the ipgn server box's??

it would add a new level of involvement to the comp what u reckon?

[Pip-Boy]

shad is no longer involved with iPGN, and I am almost certain the resources for a hltv server would more likely just go toward another regular server.

[Public.EnEmY]

lol shad is no longer hear steve :)

[sERj]

or another 3v3 comp server ?

[DANSTAR]

or another 3v3 comp server ?
I think 1 is enuff, its not like there's 2 admins always wanting to start a game and 12 players wanting to play at any 1 time.

[DANSTAR]

1 Suggestion about laggers mid game. Put game on Pause for 1-2mins or buytime to 1 mintue or 2 coz in most instances the player who drops soon comes back. i know wen i lag out or something happens, i try as fast as i can to come back. And also ring up Public Enemy to tell the admin running the game that i will be back ASAP.

[gRRRR]

Dan is gay :)

[Glide]

i think the max freeze time is 60 seconds, not sure though :S

[DANSTAR]

i've got cs problems agian :( b4 it was viruses and stuff now its flush problems

[Glide]

flush entity packet just means you have a serious connection problem.. :)

[DANSTAR]

flush entity packet just means you have a serious connection problem.. :)
i remember pl on dial up who got this could disable something in network connections or something... any1 remember what it was?

[Public.EnEmY]

look for Qos or something in network thingy, i uninstalled it so i cant see exactly the name of it, but its there Qos i am sure

[DANSTAR]

QoS Packet Scheduler.

I uninstalled it. Maybe i wont get it now.

[DANSTAR]

it also disconnected my net (most likely it reset my network card).